In the HCI Mag you know that J body issue, they tested the stock TB for an eco and it was not a bottle neck even with the supercharger. So i would have to disagree on that much hp gains. most would have come from the intake. the intakes on our cars are extremely restrictive.


ECOSPEEDZ

do you know what month hci that was?

sappyL61 wrote:^^^^
he just corrected himself if you would read what he posted
i think he mean ten hp not ten whp


well there has been more than one stock cavy dyno at 133 whp
which is only 7hp loss or 5%
so if it were a manual id bet youd be alot closer

5% HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Do you really think a FWD tranny only has a 5% power loss!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA



FU Tuning

John Higgins wrote:

sappyL61 wrote:^^^^
he just corrected himself if you would read what he posted
i think he mean ten hp not ten whp


well there has been more than one stock cavy dyno at 133 whp
which is only 7hp loss or 5%
so if it were a manual id bet youd be alot closer

5% HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Do you really think a FWD tranny only has a 5% power loss!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

no i was refering to the manual trannies
which is why i said if the car was a manual it would be alot closer

thanks for reading

There are also variations, dyno to dyno. The only reliable indicator of gains is to use the same dyno with the same multiplier settings each time.