Cavalier vs. Cobalt - Page 2 - Racing Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
Re: Cavalier vs. Cobalt
Monday, March 03, 2008 8:09 PM
dont need to change the blower



1989 Turbo Trans Am #82, 2007 Cobalt SS G85






Re: Cavalier vs. Cobalt
Monday, March 03, 2008 8:14 PM
Just making sure you didn't listen to all the "smart" people on ss.net

get the water injection installed yet? and i would run a M5 nozzle with the air your moving with the Mp62

Chris


'02 Z-24 Supercharged
13.7 @102.45 MPH Third Place, 2007 GMSC Bash SOLD AS OF 01MAR08

Re: Cavalier vs. Cobalt
Tuesday, March 04, 2008 7:53 AM
what he says is pretty true i was at street legal drags one night last year and took a 2.2 eco 2 car lengths with out my nitrous on a 1/8th mile tho
Re: Cavalier vs. Cobalt
Tuesday, March 04, 2008 8:10 AM
I have a bunch of parts laying around, waiting for the weather to be half decent

cobaltss.net isnt really smart, its alot like here people dont do common sense mods and then hurt their stuff and blame it on gm



1989 Turbo Trans Am #82, 2007 Cobalt SS G85





Re: Cavalier vs. Cobalt
Tuesday, March 04, 2008 5:04 PM
Ya, i was sorta seeing that with the "problem with the intake manifold" stuff.

Tom (wrenchmonkey) just got his, Nice ride. when ever someone come in they always talk to me about getting the GM upgrades.... guess word got out around here.

But watter injection is ALMOST a must with a Eaton. great units though.

maybe ill see ya again this year.

Chris


'02 Z-24 Supercharged
13.7 @102.45 MPH Third Place, 2007 GMSC Bash SOLD AS OF 01MAR08

Re: Cavalier vs. Cobalt
Tuesday, March 04, 2008 5:32 PM
the reason #4 goes is because of number 4 flowing more air than the other 3 and when your running a leaner AFR like 11:8 you can see no knock and if running a smaller pulley with no cooling mods it will crack the piston, cool the charge properly dont run the blower past its max rpm and keep the AFR around 11-11.3 and your just fine



1989 Turbo Trans Am #82, 2007 Cobalt SS G85





Re: Cavalier vs. Cobalt
Tuesday, March 04, 2008 6:22 PM
IMO its not the intakes fault, its the "dead head" fuel rail.... same reason why SRT4 guys switch out.


Chris


'02 Z-24 Supercharged
13.7 @102.45 MPH Third Place, 2007 GMSC Bash SOLD AS OF 01MAR08

Re: Cavalier vs. Cobalt
Tuesday, March 04, 2008 8:01 PM
if i do the hahn kit, problem solved



1989 Turbo Trans Am #82, 2007 Cobalt SS G85





Re: Cavalier vs. Cobalt
Tuesday, March 04, 2008 8:09 PM
Taetsch Z-24 wrote:IMO its not the intakes fault, its the "dead head" fuel rail.... same reason why SRT4 guys switch out.


Chris


You mean returnless fuel system? I saw on cobaltss.net that someone changed to a return fuel system. His reason was because of fuel starvation in the injector farthest away from the inlet.



Re: Cavalier vs. Cobalt
Tuesday, March 04, 2008 9:09 PM
blower swaps and turbos are less affected by this issue and can run leaner with no issues

theres currently a turbo LSJ making 421whp on a totally stock motor just swapped out injectors



1989 Turbo Trans Am #82, 2007 Cobalt SS G85





Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search