I wish I had tons of money
At the SEMA show an outstanding car the Obsidian Coupe R Ford Mustang stands alone outside. This car didn’t make it into the show, but that didn’t matter it still recieved plenty of attention. This black-gold colored Obsidian Coupe R came with 900hp, twin-supercharged engine and extremely aggressive custom appliqué. This 1967 Ford Mustang drew in the crowd by emitting notable style and function. Before one gets tired of looking at the outside styling of the car, some contemporary convenience makes quite an impact on the inside. Crafted leather seats, a sport steering wheel, and last but not least, an embedded 2.4 Ghz computer with a 60 gigabyte hard drive and a 10.5 touchscreen interface on the dash.
If I had that car and that guy had a feather in his ass we'd both be tickled!
***Looking for a BLUE 03+ STOCK cavi wing pm me if ya got one you wanna sell***
i just dont like that hood
themarin8r wrote:i just dont like that hood
you'd stil drive the hell out of it
I like this twin rotrex boosted car a bit more....
http://www.w2wpowertrain.com/t-novabuild-2.aspx
The only thing giiving this car's potential away are the cal tracs bars, and the unusually fat rear tires for stock wheel wells. They even kept the column shift..lol
.
.
Project S-Bird
That mustang has become quite the popular car in the last few months...lol.
I like everything except for the car audio crap in the back seat. Kinda look out of place IMO. Woulda been much better with a subtle system. Not gonna hear much of it anyway when the car starts up.
holy mother of god.... that thing is amazing. i want
I NEED A 00-02 SUNFIRE RK SPORT REAR LIP AND A 95-99 SUNFIRE WW FRONT LIP PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF U WANNA SELL!!
I don't know.... I would think the "baddest stang ever" would at least have an upper radiator hose so it could be driven
lol /\ i dont really care much for it...
not really getting into it... i read about that Nova in Hot Rod about a month ago, and the engineering that went into hiding everything in that car is way more impressive to me than that Mustang.
Nova: awesome.. I likes.
Stang: not my style, and not the baddest ever. The baddest ever was the first one off the line in 1964.
And now for something completely different... Click the Minister.
Heres some pics i got of it while at SEMA:
Beautiful car in person
Darkstars wrote:I don't know.... I would think the "baddest stang ever" would at least have an upper radiator hose so it could be driven
I soo agree. nice looking, but lots I hate on it. Too low, rear is ugly. The headlights they used are ugly. But it really needs to run.
FU Tuning
The Nova looks like crap. Sleeper is just the term for people too *)($&$in' lazy to clean up the body of the car should they spend that much under the hood. The Mustang is pure sex because it looks as fast as it is. It's 'tuner' styled so to speak. Dropped to the ground, making huge HP and has all the conveniences of modern cars. Mustang FTW.. ..Nova, get your ass to a bodyshop pronto.
I amend my statement earlier made:
1968 Bullitt, not the smog controlled fox-body monstrosity:
and the 1964.5 Mustang coupe:
Out bad-ass that car.
JMHO though.
And now for something completely different... Click the Minister.
kidduntradishunal wrote:The Nova looks like crap. Sleeper is just the term for people too *)($&$in' lazy to clean up the body of the car should they spend that much under the hood. The Mustang is pure sex because it looks as fast as it is. It's 'tuner' styled so to speak. Dropped to the ground, making huge HP and has all the conveniences of modern cars. Mustang FTW.. ..Nova, get your ass to a bodyshop pronto.
at least someone understands...
All of that horsepower to play with, and no way of putting it to the ground. Low profile tires with huge horsepower FTL.
That car is more than likely a show car/trailer queen.. how sad. That hood if freaking nasty too, although it does look like it has a function, so it's excuseable.
1983 Camaro Z28
Sleeper is a term for getting your ass handed to you by a car that looks like it's going to roll off into an automotive grade.
That's the difference between people that want to just go fast, and those that stop to clean off every little bug strike or trailer their car everywhere.
Nothing wrong with either, but derriding either as being stupid proves how narrow your own little head is. If you can't respect engineering that goes into a stealthed car that is fast as greased lightning, then let me know when your Ridler award winner makes it under 10 seconds, then let me know how much time and cash you spent getting the finish back.
And now for something completely different... Click the Minister.
GAM (The Kilted One) wrote:
Nothing wrong with either, but derriding either as being stupid proves how narrow your own little head is. If you can't respect engineering that goes into a stealthed car that is fast as greased lightning, then let me know when your Ridler award winner makes it under 10 seconds, then let me know how much time and cash you spent getting the finish back.
I can tell you this, that car isn't going anywhere fast with those tires. It doesn't matter how much horsepower you have, if you can't put it to the ground it makes the whole car useless.
I appreciate a sleeper more than I do a show car, the sleeper was more than likely built by someone who is a complete and total gear head, spending countless hours in his garage slaving away and spending his hard earned cash from working a job all day on something that will be his pride and joy.
Show cars are usually built by rich people with more money than brains and make a car completely useless by adding so much junk to it that you can't even drive it to the show. What the hell is the point in a car if you can't drive it? Kind of like that guy on here re-doing his whole interior in fiberglass that has his doors welded shut, and no top on the car at all.. the car is useless. Just something make to sit and look "good".
1983 Camaro Z28
.
