Quote:
PE Delay is disabled in all car calibrations.
Changing these numbers doesn't affect anything.
Quote:
it is only very rarely used on some trucks
[q/uote]
[ion wrote: C2]He posted this on EcotecForum and HPTuners Forums. I already posted this stuff in the "STFT tuning" thread, but since we're copying everything all over the interwebs, here it is again:
I just discovered you were talking about alpha-n. Mine is speed density. Might be a little different, lol.
Quote:
it is only very rarely used on some trucks
[q/uote]
John Higgins wrote:Interesting post. I was going to run a similar test myself on my LD9 (probably still will). I remember Ecotec's having the fueling issue back in the day with FMU's. I also know of one that is tuned using HPT, and the dleay is the stock 6200, but yet it has a solid AFR in the good range.
A question I have for you PJ. Your single gear runs, were they first gear runs?
BlackEco wrote:Thanks for looking into this PJ. I think it was pretty obvious to most of us w/ boosted setups, and also evidenced by Hypsy's early dyno sheets.
Looks like its time to tune out that KR too !! LOL
John Higgins wrote:BlackEco wrote:Thanks for looking into this PJ. I think it was pretty obvious to most of us w/ boosted setups, and also evidenced by Hypsy's early dyno sheets.
Looks like its time to tune out that KR too !! LOL
More than anything this proves that HPT needs to do more work for us (yeah like that is going to happen).
DaFlyinSkwir(LS61) /PJ/ OEM+ wrote:commanded AFR and actual AFR are very rarely the same.. I think it has to do with the IAT multiplier that I have a feeling we cannot see.
I took logs last night, and under WOT my commanded AFR was different from the night before.
I put 93 octane in the car because I noticed that I was getting quite a bit of kR (check out the kR readings on the pictures I posted up top.. this is on a STOCK tune!).
the only other thing that changed was outside temp and IATs
Once I figure out a way to do it, IAT in comparison to commanded AFR is going to be another subject of one of these threads
John Higgins wrote:BlackEco wrote:Thanks for looking into this PJ. I think it was pretty obvious to most of us w/ boosted setups, and also evidenced by Hypsy's early dyno sheets.
Looks like its time to tune out that KR too !! LOL
More than anything this proves that HPT needs to do more work for us (yeah like that is going to happen).
Skunk wrote:John Higgins wrote:BlackEco wrote:Thanks for looking into this PJ. I think it was pretty obvious to most of us w/ boosted setups, and also evidenced by Hypsy's early dyno sheets.
Looks like its time to tune out that KR too !! LOL
More than anything this proves that HPT needs to do more work for us (yeah like that is going to happen).
I've called hpt before asking questions about why we don't have access to certain tables and such. The answer...there's not enough interest. I understand the J is a dead platform, but seriously not enough interest? I hope to hell they were kidding. There's more 2.2 cobalts out there than any other kind yet we don't have the ability to tune them. They say no interest, there's no interest because there's no support. GM got balls deep into the ecotec and proved it to be the most dominant 4 cylinder to date w/ 1/4 mile records for a 4 cyl car and also top speed records in the same category yet hpt claims no interest. Yes GM proved what's possible with virtually limitless funds while we remained stuck in reality.
Great work PJ. Loving the curiosity bug bitting hard and getting results from it.
gmanz24 wrote:Keep replying to my thread on HPT.....Skunk wrote:John Higgins wrote:BlackEco wrote:Thanks for looking into this PJ. I think it was pretty obvious to most of us w/ boosted setups, and also evidenced by Hypsy's early dyno sheets.
Looks like its time to tune out that KR too !! LOL
More than anything this proves that HPT needs to do more work for us (yeah like that is going to happen).
I've called hpt before asking questions about why we don't have access to certain tables and such. The answer...there's not enough interest. I understand the J is a dead platform, but seriously not enough interest? I hope to hell they were kidding. There's more 2.2 cobalts out there than any other kind yet we don't have the ability to tune them. They say no interest, there's no interest because there's no support. GM got balls deep into the ecotec and proved it to be the most dominant 4 cylinder to date w/ 1/4 mile records for a 4 cyl car and also top speed records in the same category yet hpt claims no interest. Yes GM proved what's possible with virtually limitless funds while we remained stuck in reality.
Great work PJ. Loving the curiosity bug bitting hard and getting results from it.
sorry to clutter the thread with more off topic posts but i think we should organize something and mass spam hpt with our interest. we need more access to our pcm.