Spike J wrote:Only in America do criminals have more rights than victims.
John H wrote:Spike J wrote:Only in America do criminals have more rights than victims.
Ding Ding Ding The justice system there needs a major re haul as i'm sure it does everywhere else the law is corrupt and stupid .
This man provided he were younger should have shot them and actually hit them and kill them and just bury them in the backyard and don't call the cops and problem solved and if anyone else does it just make an example out of them .
Take Back the Republican Party wrote:John H wrote:Spike J wrote:Only in America do criminals have more rights than victims.
Ding Ding Ding The justice system there needs a major re haul as i'm sure it does everywhere else the law is corrupt and stupid .
This man provided he were younger should have shot them and actually hit them and kill them and just bury them in the backyard and don't call the cops and problem solved and if anyone else does it just make an example out of them .
Only in Canada do residents think they know more about America then Americans.
Oh, and Spike J: jeezus man, cheer up! Y'all are completely mistaken. You think it's bad here, try any number of third-world backwaters where criminal force IS the law. Love your country, don't piss on it...it's still the best place on Earth!
John H wrote:Take Back the Republican Party wrote:John H wrote:Spike J wrote:Only in America do criminals have more rights than victims.
Ding Ding Ding The justice system there needs a major re haul as i'm sure it does everywhere else the law is corrupt and stupid .
This man provided he were younger should have shot them and actually hit them and kill them and just bury them in the backyard and don't call the cops and problem solved and if anyone else does it just make an example out of them .
Only in Canada do residents think they know more about America then Americans.
Oh, and Spike J: jeezus man, cheer up! Y'all are completely mistaken. You think it's bad here, try any number of third-world backwaters where criminal force IS the law. Love your country, don't piss on it...it's still the best place on Earth!
I never said i knew i knew more about america then americans so take your anti-canada propaganda elsewhere .
Take Back the Republican Party wrote:John H wrote:Take Back the Republican Party wrote:John H wrote:Spike J wrote:Only in America do criminals have more rights than victims.
Ding Ding Ding The justice system there needs a major re haul as i'm sure it does everywhere else the law is corrupt and stupid .
This man provided he were younger should have shot them and actually hit them and kill them and just bury them in the backyard and don't call the cops and problem solved and if anyone else does it just make an example out of them .
Only in Canada do residents think they know more about America then Americans.
Oh, and Spike J: jeezus man, cheer up! Y'all are completely mistaken. You think it's bad here, try any number of third-world backwaters where criminal force IS the law. Love your country, don't piss on it...it's still the best place on Earth!
I never said i knew i knew more about america then americans so take your anti-canada propaganda elsewhere .
Wrong. Anti-Canada it ain't. Anti-Canadians who talk out their asses on a subject thay are unqualfied to comment on...now that's more like it. I have many Canadian friends. I rather enjoy their laid-back attitude; nay, I actually envy them for it. However, they are not your type. Good thing too, else they'd not be my friends.
Take Back the Republican Party wrote:Oh, and I forgot to mention: a private citizen who shoots thieves in the back becomes a criminal due to his poor decision making ability under duress. His actions reflect poorly on all gun owners, and also give excellent ammunition to the anti-gun lobby. Shame on him for becoming a murderous fool when the situation gets hairy. Betraying and embarrassing the right to keep and bear arms by such actions is...unforgivable.
ThatGuy85 wrote:Take Back the Republican Party wrote:Oh, and I forgot to mention: a private citizen who shoots thieves in the back becomes a criminal due to his poor decision making ability under duress. His actions reflect poorly on all gun owners, and also give excellent ammunition to the anti-gun lobby. Shame on him for becoming a murderous fool when the situation gets hairy. Betraying and embarrassing the right to keep and bear arms by such actions is...unforgivable.
For once I actually tend to agree with you. If they were actively breaking into his house and he caught them, it would be a different story and I'd be all for shooting their asses. However they were driving away and not imposing any 'life threatening' force.
He should have gotten a license plate number (if possible) before they sped away and called the cops. He knows the number on the trailer so it would be easier to catch them.
Spike J wrote:Only in America do criminals have more rights than victims.
R.W.E. of the J.B.O. wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't some states actually have laws that allow you to defend your property with deadly force if necessary?There must be limitations to "castle" laws like Texas has. For instance, shooting someone for trampling your garden might be a bit extreme, you're probably better off without your garden gnome, and those kids in your trailer next door with hands full of candy bars probably don't deserve to be shot in the back once you have them under control...
INFIDEL wrote:One of my justifications of deadly force is to prevent the severe bodily harm of a individual, it could be argued if a suspect is fleeing he will most likely do it again to someone else.Speculation alone should not be justification. Now, if he had a shopping list of victims, with names yet to be crossed off, I believe that is more than speculation; and most likely, so would a jury of his peers...
OHV notec wrote:Yes, I'm sure there are limitations. However, the first I remember hearing about them was watching some TV show (might have been Most Dangerous Jobs or something. I don't remember), but they were talking to a repo man in Texas. He had bullet proof glass installed in his truck, and set the truck up to have all the lift controls in the cab, because if he could not get someone's car on public property, it was dangerous to try to pick it up in their driveway, due to Texas laws which allowed a property owner to shoot someone (including a repo man who is merely taking back something owned by the bank which hired him) for being on their property taking something.R.W.E. of the J.B.O. wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't some states actually have laws that allow you to defend your property with deadly force if necessary?There must be limitations to "castle" laws like Texas has. For instance, shooting someone for trampling your garden might be a bit extreme, you're probably better off without your garden gnome, and those kids in your trailer next door with hands full of candy bars probably don't deserve to be shot in the back once you have them under control...
Defender of My Waterpark wrote:All violent criminals suffer from the same illness: Acute lead deficiency.