INFIDEL wrote:Wasn't there a book about sh!t like this....
1948..... no no... 1984, that was it!
Chris
Quote:
as far as toledo finding people who don't put there cans out right. consider that a tax on the stupid. i mean its not hard to put the cans out properly. its not like its major work to set them out the right way.
mclonedogmcwad wrote:Part 1...Up until the paper section, well, duh. I was under the impression that people understood the extra cost (energy and $$$) involved with recycling plastic
Part 2
Kevin Trudeau wrote:It has nothing to do with saving dear mother earth. Its a backdoor tax.
.
sndsgood wrote:im going to kick up the @!#$storm and say good for cleveland, im in no way an evirofreak, but since we have been given new cans. a 55 gallon or more sized trash can and a smaller recyclable can that is maybe 75% the size of the standard can, its amazing how much recyclable trash i used to throw away. my recyclable can is almost full every other week, the trash can maybe gets filled 25% each week, im easily throwing out as much recyclables as i am standard trash. if your ass is too lazy to use recyclables then go ahead and fine them. landfills just keep filling up. people need to recycle that stuff. its not like cities have enough money as it is to stay afloat in most places. id find it higly doubtful that they are being fined for not making enough trash. if they are putting out the trash can every week and just not putting out the recycalbles. if you go to the grocery store you will have recylcables.
Quote:
Why Should You Recycle?
Recycling is the easiest way for you to go green at home. Not only will you do your part for the environment by reducing waste, you�ll save taxpayer dollars at the same time.
� For every ton we recycle, the City saves $23 in landfill fees and gains more than $45 in revenue.
� In 2009, recycling saved the City more than $287,500 in landfill fees.
� The money saved allows the City to expand and improve recycling in your neighborhoods and business districts.
Quote:Probably saved two city jobs.
Saving close to 300k is peanuts with the size of the city budget, however not everybody recycles.
sndsgood wrote:kevin, do you think anyone would care or give a damn if the mayor goes. "well i'll have to layoff my assistant" no, nobody would care or bat an eye. you dont get the votes you need for something by waving something in the publics face that they dont care about.That's exactly the point. They get people to fall for the crap of raising taxes, or charging for trash pick up, etc. by telling the public that layoffs would be needed in places people are afraid of having them, when in fact they have plenty of other places to cut. It was a tangent, but it's something a lot of people need to wake up to.
R.W.E. of the J.B.O. wrote:That's exactly the point. They get people to fall for the crap of raising taxes, or charging for trash pick up, etc. by telling the public that layoffs would be needed in places people are afraid of having them, when in fact they have plenty of other places to cut. It was a tangent, but it's something a lot of people need to wake up to.But, I've noticed that they often do layoff those positions first. They're not just trying to scare people, they actually follow through. It's easiest to make cuts to services which have no clear requirement as to labor size.
R.W.E. of the J.B.O. wrote:sndsgood wrote:kevin, do you think anyone would care or give a damn if the mayor goes. "well i'll have to layoff my assistant" no, nobody would care or bat an eye. you dont get the votes you need for something by waving something in the publics face that they dont care about.That's exactly the point. They get people to fall for the crap of raising taxes, or charging for trash pick up, etc. by telling the public that layoffs would be needed in places people are afraid of having them, when in fact they have plenty of other places to cut. It was a tangent, but it's something a lot of people need to wake up to.
sndsgood wrote:I don't expect that to change, but what I would like to see is more of the general public stop falling for it.R.W.E. of the J.B.O. wrote:sndsgood wrote:kevin, do you think anyone would care or give a damn if the mayor goes. "well i'll have to layoff my assistant" no, nobody would care or bat an eye. you dont get the votes you need for something by waving something in the publics face that they dont care about.That's exactly the point. They get people to fall for the crap of raising taxes, or charging for trash pick up, etc. by telling the public that layoffs would be needed in places people are afraid of having them, when in fact they have plenty of other places to cut. It was a tangent, but it's something a lot of people need to wake up to.
but again, if your goal is to raise more money, you wont get the votes by offering them something they don't care about, if you expect them to do otherwise i think you being a bit naieve.