which is better - Performance Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
which is better
Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:43 PM
doing an eco swap once i get the money and i was wondering which is better 4-2-1 header or 4-1 header?

i need opinions on best quality, sound, power, installation, price, etc




Re: which is better
Friday, February 12, 2010 6:11 AM
4-1 = more top end power
4-2-1 = more low/mid range power

but to be honest, the numbers aren't really that different between the two and if I was using it for a DD, I would prob get a 4-2-1.

your power will be more usable under DD conditions.

that's my 2-cents



Re: which is better
Friday, February 12, 2010 6:16 AM
General rules of thumb:

4:2:1 - better mid-rpm hp and tq
4:1 short primarys(like pacesetter) - better high-rpm hp
4:1 long primarys(RD Fabs) - decent compromise of both.




219whp - I <3 whine

Re: which is better
Friday, February 12, 2010 12:04 PM
so which would you guys choose, the tsudo 4-2-1 or the pacesetter 4-1. on ecotecforum.com they are all saying the tsudo but id like to get a broad opnion.



Re: which is better
Friday, February 12, 2010 12:08 PM
I personally have always used the 4-1 for more top end.


-Aaron
www.TurboTechRacing.com

Performance Parts For Cavalier, Sunfire, Cobalts and More!!!
Re: which is better
Friday, February 12, 2010 1:21 PM
Mine is a 4:1 long tube from RD Fabs(the eco "race header" in their feb sale thread is the exact one). Kinda looks like the pacesetter, but only alot bigger. I have noticed a decent gain up top and practically no loss down low.




219whp - I <3 whine

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search