would a 2.4 h.o intake mani + a 2.0 lsj tb be an upgrade for a turboed 2.2 ecotec? what kind of increase? how hard to install?
lsj tb wont work check out the mideast region couple guys selling ported tb
RIP Cpl Derek Kerns And Cpl Robby Reyes
24th MEU VMM-261 (REIN) V22 Crewchiefs
11 April 2012 Morocco (African Lion)
the 2.4 h.o i found is sold with the 2.0 tb and the adapter plate.... is it worth it? ($360)
the 2.0 tb will not work its electric where as the jbody tb is mechanical
RIP Cpl Derek Kerns And Cpl Robby Reyes
24th MEU VMM-261 (REIN) V22 Crewchiefs
11 April 2012 Morocco (African Lion)
An HO manifold is not designed for a Quad engine. Why does everyone want to put it on their Eco? Its been done once and looked atrocious and didnt do anything IIRC.
I hear LS1 TBs can be adapted but yes the LSJ is drive by wire so no connectivity with the Cav.
I have 2 aftermarket manifolds and 75mm tb's with all sensors for sale in the Mideast forum (500 each) that have been proven to work on exotic and are set To go. Like said above the lsj tb is ran by electronics where ours is cable driven. And the 2.4 manifold unless meaning the 2.4 ecotec manifold will not work. Either way an aftermarket intake is the way to go with a boosted car.
TheSundownFire (GME Chat) wrote:An HO manifold is not designed for a Quad engine. Why does everyone want to put it on their Eco? Its been done once and looked atrocious and didnt do anything IIRC.
I hear LS1 TBs can be adapted but yes the LSJ is drive by wire so no connectivity with the Cav.
The confuse the 2.4 HO mani and the 2.4 LE5 mani thats why.
1994 Saturn SL2 Home Coming Edition: backup car
2002 Chevy Cavalier LS Sport Coupe: In a Junk Yard
1995 Mazda Miata R-package Class=STR
Sponsored by:
Kronos Performance
WPI Class of '12 Mechanical Engineering
WPI SAE Risk and Sustainability Management Officer
Leafy wrote:TheSundownFire (GME Chat) wrote:An HO manifold is not designed for a Quad engine. Why does everyone want to put it on their Eco? Its been done once and looked atrocious and didnt do anything IIRC.
I hear LS1 TBs can be adapted but yes the LSJ is drive by wire so no connectivity with the Cav.
The confuse the 2.4 HO mani and the 2.4 LE5 mani thats why.
I guess that makes sense. But the HO is from a 2.3. Idk.
TheSundownFire (GME Chat) wrote:Leafy wrote:TheSundownFire (GME Chat) wrote:An HO manifold is not designed for a Quad engine. Why does everyone want to put it on their Eco? Its been done once and looked atrocious and didnt do anything IIRC.
I hear LS1 TBs can be adapted but yes the LSJ is drive by wire so no connectivity with the Cav.
The confuse the 2.4 HO mani and the 2.4 LE5 mani thats why.
I guess that makes sense. But the HO is from a 2.3. Idk.
yes it is, and it has been mated to an eco before, and you were correct before when you said it basically did nothing. everybody wants to try it because the stock eco intake mani sucks and there's no other decent option other than the le5 if you like losing low end pull.
Like any 4 cyl actually has torque
that's the point, y would you want to lose the little you have lol.
