2.2 liter - Performance Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
2.2 liter
Wednesday, March 02, 2011 6:24 PM
i got a 1990 cavalier 2.2 liter automatic with 297,380 miles to my knowledge its all original and all stock i want to do some performance upgrades i want to keep the original block and tranny i mostly just want to be able get to highway speeds

Re: 2.2 liter
Wednesday, March 02, 2011 7:35 PM
Aaron Herriott wrote:i got a 1990 cavalier 2.2 liter automatic with 297,380 miles to my knowledge its all original and all stock i want to do some performance upgrades i want to keep the original block and tranny i mostly just want to be able get to highway speeds



a rebuild to both the engine and trans is where i'd start. have the head ported while it's off, while reassembling, add either 1.6 rockers or a big cam, and ignition upgrades.



JBO Stickers! Get yours today!
Re: 2.2 liter
Thursday, March 03, 2011 3:54 AM
i was thinking about that do know a rough est. of how much that would be

im getting really annoyed of getting to the red 55mph on the speedo and barley moving after that
Re: 2.2 liter
Thursday, March 03, 2011 4:47 AM
Rich Grayo Jr. wrote:
Aaron Herriott wrote:i got a 1990 cavalier 2.2 liter automatic with 297,380 miles to my knowledge its all original and all stock i want to do some performance upgrades i want to keep the original block and tranny i mostly just want to be able get to highway speeds



a rebuild to both the engine and trans is where i'd start. have the head ported while it's off, while reassembling, add either 1.6 rockers or a big cam, and ignition upgrades.


I agree. This is very good advise.


-Aaron
www.TurboTechRacing.com

Performance Parts For Cavalier, Sunfire, Cobalts and More!!!
Re: 2.2 liter
Thursday, March 03, 2011 3:28 PM
Rich Grayo Jr. wrote:
Aaron Herriott wrote:i got a 1990 cavalier 2.2 liter automatic with 297,380 miles to my knowledge its all original and all stock i want to do some performance upgrades i want to keep the original block and tranny i mostly just want to be able get to highway speeds



a rebuild to both the engine and trans is where i'd start. have the head ported while it's off, while reassembling, add either 1.6 rockers or a big cam, and ignition upgrades.


F_CK that, keep it stock and go for a new high score.





i find it amusing that SHOoff has nothing better to do but follow me around & be an unhelpful dick in even cross-forum. - Jon Mick
Re: 2.2 liter
Thursday, March 03, 2011 3:34 PM
you really cant get past 55? soemthing's wrong lol not even talking the mileage....bc my friend has a civic with 380,000 miles and it still pulls hard, the vtec stick kicks...its completely stock, only things he changes are mantenance things like plugs/wire/battery/oil/ect.



Re: 2.2 liter
Friday, March 04, 2011 9:52 AM
Honestly upgrading to all the equipment from a 93 Cavalier would probably go a long way. You'd go from the TB injection to MPFI, and also go from 90hp to 120.





i find it amusing that SHOoff has nothing better to do but follow me around & be an unhelpful dick in even cross-forum. - Jon Mick
Re: 2.2 liter
Friday, March 04, 2011 8:22 PM
full exhaust, cams, cold air intake. that'll get you moving pretty good for starters.
but if you dont do anything for a while, replace the timing set!! at least then you can still keep it on the road.
Re: 2.2 liter
Friday, March 04, 2011 8:59 PM
exhaust is strait pipe right now i just changed the belts, oil, spark plugs and wires, and cleaned up the alternator im gettin around 70mph on the speedo now
Re: 2.2 liter
Saturday, March 05, 2011 4:10 AM
SHOoff wrote:Honestly upgrading to all the equipment from a 93 Cavalier would probably go a long way. You'd go from the TB injection to MPFI, and also go from 90hp to 120.


QFT. Didn't realize '93 had the bump in power. I know '94 does.




Re: 2.2 liter
Saturday, March 05, 2011 5:28 AM
SHOoff wrote:Honestly upgrading to all the equipment from a 93 Cavalier would probably go a long way. You'd go from the TB injection to MPFI, and also go from 90hp to 120.

Ive got 95 2.2, what you're saying is i can go to junk yard and pull parts from a 93 2.2 and get more power? please go more into detail what parts and simple bolt on?




Re: 2.2 liter
Saturday, March 05, 2011 5:53 AM
It's the other way around 95ls. The older 2.2 will make more power with an upgraded fuel delivery system.



Re: 2.2 liter
Saturday, March 05, 2011 9:23 AM
Mike wrote:It's the other way around 95ls. The older 2.2 will make more power with an upgraded fuel delivery system.

oooohhh id be losing power haha his engine with my parts is what he meant



Re: 2.2 liter
Saturday, March 05, 2011 1:40 PM
no the older 2.2 was 90hp then 93-97was 120hp then 98-02 was 115 but the 93-97 had 5ftlbs of torque less then a 98+ modle



JBO since July 30, 2001
Re: 2.2 liter
Sunday, March 06, 2011 12:39 AM
The choice bolt-ons would be the management, the head & manifolds, and the cam & lifters from the '93-'94 engine. As for whatever Aaron has done so-far... It seems like the car in question was just suffering a clogged catalytic-converter. I've had my '94 S-truck fall on it's face just trying to putter around my uncle's neighborhood because of one, and this was after finishing swapping cranks in it! (It was LN2-powered also.) A drop of the extension-pipe, a few punches inside the cat with a jack handle, start the engine & hit the throttle a few times, shut-off engine & repeat last three steps a few times... And it was fine! I didn't need to worry about what effect it'd have on the management (Pre-OBD-II... no after-cat EGOS!) and it actually got 1mpg better on-average with it gutted than it did with the replacement (Still fell under local emissions laws at the time).


Go beyond the "bolt-on".
Re: 2.2 liter
Sunday, March 06, 2011 6:16 PM
^ I have to agree that something like that is wrong. To hold highway speed it really only takes a few HP. So if you're really struggling to get that speed then you've got something wrong.





i find it amusing that SHOoff has nothing better to do but follow me around & be an unhelpful dick in even cross-forum. - Jon Mick
Re: 2.2 liter
Monday, March 07, 2011 1:30 AM
Irony: How few people know that the scheduled replacement of the catalytic-converter is 100k-mi.

Think about it...!


Go beyond the "bolt-on".
Re: 2.2 liter
Tuesday, March 08, 2011 9:30 AM
Rich Grayo Jr. wrote:
Aaron Herriott wrote:i got a 1990 cavalier 2.2 liter automatic with 297,380 miles to my knowledge its all original and all stock i want to do some performance upgrades i want to keep the original block and tranny i mostly just want to be able get to highway speeds



a rebuild to both the engine and trans is where i'd start. have the head ported while it's off, while reassembling, add either 1.6 rockers or a big cam, and ignition upgrades.


x3
Re: 2.2 liter
Tuesday, March 08, 2011 3:04 PM
Nickelin Dimer wrote:Irony: How few people know that the scheduled replacement of the catalytic-converter is 100k-mi.

Think about it...!


How do they figure that? I know warranty is 80k. I've had plenty of car go past that mark and not get replacement cat. But, I guess keeping your @!#$ in good running condition goes a long way.





i find it amusing that SHOoff has nothing better to do but follow me around & be an unhelpful dick in even cross-forum. - Jon Mick
Re: 2.2 liter
Tuesday, March 08, 2011 7:25 PM
Really guys? I'm all for giving bad advice but beyond trying to fix whats wrong with it. Leave the damn thing stock, keep it as a winter beater and buy something else if you want to go fast.


1994 Saturn SL2 Home Coming Edition: backup car
2002 Chevy Cavalier LS Sport Coupe: In a Junk Yard
1995 Mazda Miata R-package Class=STR
Sponsored by: Kronos Performance

WPI Class of '12 Mechanical Engineering
WPI SAE Risk and Sustainability Management Officer
Re: 2.2 liter
Wednesday, March 09, 2011 6:07 AM
SHOoff wrote:
Nickelin Dimer wrote:Irony: How few people know that the scheduled replacement of the catalytic-converter is 100k-mi.

Think about it...!


How do they figure that?


I dunno... But every service-manual I've ever perused states exactly that. Go figure....


Go beyond the "bolt-on".

Re: 2.2 liter
Wednesday, March 09, 2011 8:38 AM
Hey guys, i wanted to ask whats the next step for my car? im done with the exhaust and wanted to know if a cam would add more torque?
thanks


Re: 2.2 liter
Wednesday, March 09, 2011 9:30 AM
Pontiac Racing! wrote:Hey guys, i wanted to ask whats the next step for my car? im done with the exhaust and wanted to know if a cam would add more torque?
thanks


dont bother with a cam on a 2.2/2200. drop a v6 in it
Re: 2.2 liter
Wednesday, March 09, 2011 9:50 AM
Dustin Ouellette wrote:
Pontiac Racing! wrote:Hey guys, i wanted to ask whats the next step for my car? im done with the exhaust and wanted to know if a cam would add more torque?
thanks


dont bother with a cam on a 2.2/2200. drop a v6 in it


Wrong.

Do whatever you want to it. There are a couple places that will do cam regrinds.



Re: 2.2 liter
Wednesday, March 09, 2011 1:14 PM
ok, but what would you prefer to do next?


Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search