?? which would sound better - Audio & Electronics Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
?? which would sound better
Friday, June 16, 2006 1:29 PM
I have this sub 12" with this box
and this amp
the box has the abilitie to be closed or open port should i close it off?




Re: ?? which would sound better
Friday, June 16, 2006 1:31 PM
i wouldnt go with prefab boxes they seem to be tunes retardedly, so if you must go with the sealed one but id really suggest building your own...its not hard and you save money


wysiwyg wrote:i would say they bang, they don't really pound so much. but if
you want to bump, then they will bump and hit real hard and a lot good.

LOL
Re: ?? which would sound better
Friday, June 16, 2006 1:38 PM

Sub:

800 Watts RMS
Vas: 1.91 cu.ft.

Sealed box: 1.2cu. Ft.
Ported box: 2 cu.. Ft.
Tuning: 40 Hz

Port Size: 4”(dia)x8.75”(length)
# of ports:1


Amp:


500W RMS (continuous) x 1 @ 4 ohms, bridged
250W RMS (continuous) x 2 @ 2 ohms
200W RMS (continuous) x 2 @ 4 ohms

Box:


1.25 cu. ft. chamber with sealed or slot-vented capabilities



1) it would sound better sealed, or your gonna have to polyfill your box if you want a recommended internal volume for ported.

2) Your amp is way underpowered.





Re: ?? which would sound better
Friday, June 16, 2006 1:38 PM
already got it i knew if i made it would be bigger and harder to take out so i picked out a setup based on weigh sound and watts it works



Re: ?? which would sound better
Friday, June 16, 2006 1:40 PM
yeah but the amp was one i have worked with before and for what i paid for it.



Re: ?? which would sound better
Friday, June 16, 2006 1:44 PM
thanks thats what i was thinking and using the sae rms as the sub i have blown them doing that. now that sucks"rather be under powered and have a couple pennies more in my pocket than blow another sub'
Quote:

1) it would sound better sealed, or your gonna have to polyfill your box if you want a recommended internal volume for ported.




Re: ?? which would sound better
Friday, June 16, 2006 1:47 PM
With a sealed enclosure you wont need as much power as per a ported enclosurer. A sealed enclosure responds quicker but is less boomier then ported, also you get less excursion issues with sealed then ported. The air sealed in a seal enclosure works like a spring pushing the cone back out, reducing power usage, but does not distort as much during fast beats.



Re: ?? which would sound better
Friday, June 16, 2006 1:50 PM
also, 1 pound of poly fill is a pretty close measurement for 1 cu foot. And poly fill only cost about $3 usd per pound. So your gonna need about 12 oz. of poly fill to get to spec. But your gonna need something like a mesh screen to keep it in the box.



Re: ?? which would sound better
Friday, June 16, 2006 1:58 PM
sweet thats good info my freind does spl but he is so busy he has not even seen my set up. the funny thing is he is known as loudcavy8's now at 18,000 watts using a merc mointaineer and 8volt batteries. thanks



Re: ?? which would sound better
Friday, June 16, 2006 2:03 PM
May i make one other suggestion though?

Find a good 12 guage wire for your sub hook up and amp hook up, In my personal experiance, i get the best results with 12 guage.



Re: ?? which would sound better
Saturday, June 17, 2006 8:00 AM
i was actualy going to run 10 or use two wires 14 guage same length twisted together in a rubber sleeve. the amp has these wires
i just took out the 6 guage and used only the 4 thats why it looked so bad in this pic
the ground wire is only like two feet long and i had to mout the amp their




Re: ?? which would sound better
Saturday, June 17, 2006 9:33 AM
what i meant by 12 awg wire was the actual wire that hooks your sub to the box, and the box terminals to the (+) and (-) on the amp.

I use tsunami 12 awg subwoofer wire, with tsunami 4 awg for both Power and ground. My power and groud connect to the amp with Crimpless ring terminals. Which did help me, though i had to pay a bit more for them, my crimped Hooked spade terminals kept comming loose when i drived.


If you want to clean up your wiring mess, i can give you a few suggestions. If you drop the rear seat down, and pull off the trim that surrounds the opening, on the upper rights behing the trim panal, is a 1.5" opening which goes to right above your strut tower on the same sime. These holes are found on both sides. I have my power and ground through the hole on the driver side, and my RCA's on the passanger side. With doing that, most of your excess wire can be easily hide behide the carpeting in the trunk, and for simple, clean connections, just run the wires you need under the rear deck, suspended by zip ties or something like that.

As soon as i finish work today, ill take some pics for you for clarification.



Re: ?? which would sound better
Saturday, June 17, 2006 10:45 AM
cool i have zippy's just have gotten around to using them with my "spireted" driving Just keeping it the same place is becoming a challange. I bolted it down instead of screwing it on the side i could. I think i am going to ad another screw to the other side though. it already has three dents. in the picture you can actualy see the first one on the amp.



Re: ?? which would sound better
Saturday, June 17, 2006 2:20 PM
I hope my boss doesnt kill me for posting pics at work, but here you go.







I hope these give you some kinda idea about what i was talking about.



If you have anymore questions just ask, or PM me and ill get you an answer as soon as i can.



Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search