protomec wrote:
100% of 96 J's are SOL
97-99 J's are covered by HP tuners.
Nate (THE NASTY ONE) wrote:why are the 96's sol?
Rich Grayo Jr. wrote:
because they're an evil bastard child.
gm decided to put out a half-assed ecu in 1996. it is techinically obd-II, but just barely. the first half of the year, the setup was obd-1 programming using obd-2 hardware. once they switched to a complete obd-2 setup, they gave it very limited capabilities, and tuning wasnt one of them.
hptuners doesnt support them, and they're not chippable.
protomec wrote:Rich Grayo Jr. wrote:
because they're an evil bastard child.
gm decided to put out a half-assed ecu in 1996. it is techinically obd-II, but just barely. the first half of the year, the setup was obd-1 programming using obd-2 hardware. once they switched to a complete obd-2 setup, they gave it very limited capabilities, and tuning wasnt one of them.
hptuners doesnt support them, and they're not chippable.
Nope.
96 is fully OBD2. No bastard anything. 95 was the only bastard halfway year.
Here's the breakdown:
95 2.2 (all) and 2.3 Manual use the same chippable PCM. (this is the bastard PCM)
95 2.3 Auto and 96 (all) use the same PCM.
97-99 (all) use the same PCM.
99.5-2002 (all) use the same PCM.
The 96 PCM is just as "tunable" as any other, but the only 2 companies that support J-body PCM tuning -- HPtuners and EFI Live -- have not and currently will not take the time to invest in decoding the program for modification.
I would guess that they do not believe there would be enough interest (sales) to justify the investment. Something that they are probably correct in assuming because I doubt there are more than 20 people seriously interested in tuning a 96.
I don't think the later year's PCMs have been a screaming success on an individual year basis either.
steve white wrote:With all of that being said, i should point out, that a 96 in not completely SOL. You can rewire a 96 to a 97 pcm iirc. Then you can tune it. Please correct me if im wrong.
protomec wrote:Rich Grayo Jr. wrote:
because they're an evil bastard child.
gm decided to put out a half-assed ecu in 1996. it is techinically obd-II, but just barely. the first half of the year, the setup was obd-1 programming using obd-2 hardware. once they switched to a complete obd-2 setup, they gave it very limited capabilities, and tuning wasnt one of them.
hptuners doesnt support them, and they're not chippable.
Nope.
96 is fully OBD2. No bastard anything. 95 was the only bastard halfway year.
Here's the breakdown:
95 2.2 (all) and 2.3 Manual use the same chippable PCM. (this is the bastard PCM)
95 2.3 Auto and 96 (all) use the same PCM.
97-99 (all) use the same PCM.
99.5-2002 (all) use the same PCM.
The 96 PCM is just as "tunable" as any other, but the only 2 companies that support J-body PCM tuning -- HPtuners and EFI Live -- have not and currently will not take the time to invest in decoding the program for modification.
I would guess that they do not believe there would be enough interest (sales) to justify the investment. Something that they are probably correct in assuming because I doubt there are more than 20 people seriously interested in tuning a 96.
I don't think the later year's PCMs have been a screaming success on an individual year basis either.
Shifted wrote:
I have to disagree with you on this one Todd...
They are not fully OBD-2 compliant, some have 3 plug ECU's and some have 2 plug ECU's. They all came with OBD-2 style ports, but some of them (the 3 plug ones) cannot be read with standard OBD-2 scanners (they need an OBD-1 scanner with an OBD-2 plug). HPT doesn't support them because if they sold one to a guy who couldn't figure out if the one he had was OBD-1.5 or OBD-2, then they'd get pissed and return them, along with the "bad press" that goes along with it.