You have received a forum warning:

Warning: Please update your registry with proper info as per the TOS before posting again.
Expires: Saturday, August 5, 2006 10:58 AM PT


Did you know that the holes only natural enemy is the pile.

I think you're missing your name. (name instead of silver Z)

Quote:

YOUR REGISTRATION

In consideration of your use of the Service, you agree to: (a) provide true, accurate, current and complete information about yourself as prompted by the Service's registration form (such information being the "Registration Data") and (b) maintain and promptly update the Registration Data to keep it true, accurate, current and complete. If you provide any information that is untrue, inaccurate, not current or incomplete, or GME has reasonable grounds to suspect that such information is untrue, inaccurate, not current or incomplete, GME has the right to suspend or terminate your account and refuse any and all current or future use of the Service (or any portion thereof). GME is concerned about the safety and privacy of all its members, particularly minors. Please remember that the Service is designed to appeal to a broad audience.

TOS=Terms of Service

So, yup, I would imagine that that would be it.

-Crystal

Yep. That's it. Next time please use the "Contact Us" link on the left for questions about warnings or bans.

Crystal(CrazyCavGirl) OR Jacob wrote:TOS=Terms of Service

So, yup, I would imagine that that would be it.

-Crystal

hows that double account going for you


"boobs now with Riboflabin"

Im a level 32 joedm newb flamer.

Are you kidding?
did the countless other people that do not have their names in their profile also get this warning?

Jcavi wrote:hows that double account going for you

It's going great for me. Thanks for your concern.

-Crystal

Jcavi wrote:

Crystal(CrazyCavGirl) OR Jacob wrote:TOS=Terms of Service

So, yup, I would imagine that that would be it.

-Crystal

hows that double account going for you

if you don't know the reasoning, you dont need to be complaining.

themarin8r wrote:Are you kidding?
did the countless other people that do not have their names in their profile also get this warning?

There might have been another issue involved here.

themarin8r wrote:Are you kidding?
did the countless other people that do not have their names in their profile also get this warning?

Maybe that's what they're working on or they're just doing it as they casually come across it. Who knows.

-Crystal

Jcavi wrote:

Crystal(CrazyCavGirl) OR Jacob wrote:TOS=Terms of Service

So, yup, I would imagine that that would be it.

-Crystal

hows that double account going for you

i shall put this as dumb as possible so you can follow along with us
Lets review why a non-premo member would use another persons account, or share accounts or have a duplicate account shall we?
the most common reason, and really the only reason, would be to circumvent the 100 post limit, right?
Now does a premo member have that limit? no you say? well then, there goes that reason!
Did these people go and ask Dave if it was ok, so that if there were any problems beforehand, they wouldnt waste their time and/or money sharing an account? Why, yes they did!
So by getting approval from Dave, and being premo, why is this of your concern? you dont know? well, its not
so why bring it up again? just to be a bitch? ah, i see, that was why


oh and your sig is wrong
it should say Level 32 Cocksucker

Crystal(CrazyCavGirl) OR Jacob wrote:

themarin8r wrote:Are you kidding?
did the countless other people that do not have their names in their profile also get this warning?

Maybe that's what they're working on or they're just doing it as they casually come across it. Who knows.

-Crystal

This is exactly it. We call it as we see it. Once the warning is on record, then further action is taken if it's not complied with.

And normally these sorts of threads are locked as soon as they're started. This one just happened to have a civil and honestly inquisitive tone to it so I let it be, figuring there'd be plenty of others with the same question or the same registry issue and they could all fix it before it was noticed, saving the moderators some effort.

Clearly though, I should have just locked it.